APPENDIX
From the "London Magazine" for December 1822.
The proprietors of this little work having
determined on reprinting it, some
explanation seems called for, to
account for the non-
appearance of a third part promised in the London Magazine of December last; and the more so because the proprietors, under whose
guarantee that
promise was issued,
might otherwise be implicated in the
blame-little or much-attached to its non-fulfilment. This
blame, in
mere justice, the
author takes
wholly upon himself. What may be the
exact amount of the
guilt which he
thus appropriates is a very dark question to his own
judgment, and not much illuminated by any of the masters in
casuistry whom he has consulted on the
occasion. On the one hand it seems generally agreed that a
promise is binding in the
inverse ratio of the numbers to whom it is made; for which
reason it is that we see many persons break promises without
scruple that are made to a whole
nation, who keep their
faith religiously in all
private engagements, breaches of
promise towards the stronger party being
committed at a man's own
peril; on the other hand, the only parties
interested in the promises of an
author are his readers, and these it is a point of
modesty in any
author to believe as few as
possible-or perhaps only one, in which case any
promise imposes a
sanctity of
moral obligation which it is shocking to think of. Casuistry dismissed, however, the
author throws himself on the
indulgent consideration of all who may
conceive themselves aggrieved by his
delay, in the following
account of his own
condition from the end of last year, when the
engagement was made, up nearly to the present time. For any
purpose of self-excuse it
might be
sufficient to say that
intolerable bodily
suffering had totally disabled him for almost any
exertion of
mind, more especially for such as demands and presupposes a pleasurable and
genial state of feeling; but, as a case that may by
possibility contribute a
trifle to the
medical history of opium, in a further stage of its action than can often have been brought under the
notice of
professional men, he has judged that it
might be
acceptable to some readers to have it described more at
length. Fiat experimentum in corpore vili is a just rule where there is any
reasonable presumption of
benefit to
arise on a large
scale. What the
benefit may be will
admit of a
doubt, but there can be none as to the
value of the body; for a more
worthless body than his own the
author is free to
confess cannot be. It is his
pride to believe that it is the very
ideal of a
base, crazy,
despicable human system, that hardly ever could have been meant to be seaworthy for two days under the
ordinary storms and wear and tear of life; and indeed, if that were the creditable way of disposing of
human bodies, he must own that he should almost be
ashamed to
bequeath his
wretched structure to any
respectable dog. But now to the case, which, for the sake of avoiding the
constant recurrence of a
cumbersome periphrasis, the
author will take the
liberty of giving in the first person.
Those who have read the Confessions will have closed them with the
impression that I had
wholly renounced the use of opium. This
impression I meant to
convey, and that for two reasons: first, because the very act of
deliberately recording such a
state of
suffering necessarily presumes in the recorder a
power of surveying his own case as a cool
spectator, and a
degree of spirits for
adequately describing it which it would be
inconsistent to
suppose in any person speaking from the
station of an actual sufferer; secondly, because I, who had descended from so large a
quantity as 8,000 drops to so small a one (comparatively speaking) as a
quantity ranging between 300 and 160 drops,
might well
suppose that the
victory was in
effect achieved. In
suffering my readers, therefore, to think of me as of a reformed opium-eater, I left no
impression but what I shared myself; and, as may be seen, even this
impression was left to be
collected from the
general tone of the
conclusion, and not from any
specific words, which are in no
instance at
variance with the
literal truth. In no long time after that paper was written I became
sensible that the
effort which remained would cost me far more
energy than I had anticipated, and the
necessity for making it was more
apparent every month. In
particular I became
aware of an increasing
callousness or
defect of
sensibility in the stomach, and this I imagined
might imply a scirrhous
state of that
organ, either formed or forming. An
eminent physician, to whose kindness I was at that time deeply
indebted, informed me that such a
termination of my case was not
impossible, though
likely to be forestalled by a
different termination in the
event of my continuing the use of opium. Opium therefore I resolved
wholly to
abjure as soon as I should find myself at
liberty to bend my undivided
attention and
energy to this
purpose. It was not, however, until the 24th of June last that any
tolerable concurrence of facilities for such an
attempt arrived. On that day I began my
experiment, having
previously settled in my own
mind that I would not
flinch, but would "stand up to the
scratch" under any
possible "
punishment." I must
premise that about 170 or 180 drops had been my
ordinary allowance for many months;
occasionally I had run up as high as 500, and once nearly to 700; in
repeated preludes to my
final experiment I had also gone as low as 100 drops; but had found it
impossible to stand it beyond the fourth day-which, by the way, I have always found more
difficult to get over than any of the
preceding three. I went off under easy
sail-130 drops a day for three days; on the fourth I plunged at once to 80. The
misery which I now suffered "took the
conceit" out of me at once, and for about a month I continued off and on about this mark; then I sunk to 60, and the next day to-none at all. This was the first day for nearly ten years that I had existed without opium. I persevered in my
abstinence for ninety hours; i.e., upwards of half a week. Then I took-ask me not how much; say, ye severest, what would ye have done? Then I abstained again-then took about 25 drops then abstained; and so on.
Meantime the symptoms which attended my case for the first six weeks of my
experiment were these:
enormous irritability and
excitement of the whole
system; the stomach in
particular restored to a full feeling of
vitality and
sensibility, but often in great pain; unceasing restlessness night and day; sleep-I
scarcely knew what it was; three hours out of the twenty-four was the
utmost I had, and that so
agitated and
shallow that I heard every
sound that was near me. Lower jaw constantly swelling, mouth ulcerated, and many other distressing symptoms that would be
tedious to
repeat; amongst which, however, I must
mention one, because it had never failed to
accompany any
attempt to
renounce opium-viz.,
violent sternutation. This now became exceedingly
troublesome, sometimes lasting for two hours at once, and
recurring at least twice or three times a day. I was not much surprised at this on recollecting what I had somewhere heard or read, that the
membrane which lines the nostrils is a prolongation of that which lines the stomach;
whence, I believe, are explained the
inflammatory appearances about the nostrils of dram drinkers. The sudden
restoration of its
original sensibility to the stomach expressed itself, I
suppose, in this way. It is also that during the whole
period of years
through which I had taken opium I had never once caught cold (as the
phrase is), nor even the slightest cough. But now a
violent cold attacked me, and a cough soon after. In an unfinished
fragment of a letter begun about this time to-I find these words: "You ask me to write the-Do you know Beaumont and Fletcher's play of "Thierry and Theodore"? There you will see my case as to sleep; nor is it much of an
exaggeration in other features. I
protest to you that I have a greater
influx of thoughts in one hour at present than in a whole year under the
reign of opium. It seems as though all the thoughts which had been frozen up for a
decade of years by opium had now,
according to the old
fable, been thawed at once-such a
multitude stream in upon me from all quarters. Yet such is my
impatience and
hideous irritability that for one which I
detain and write down fifty
escape me: in
spite of my
weariness from
suffering and want of sleep, I cannot stand still or sit for two minutes together. 'I nunc, et versus tecum meditare canoros.'"
At this stage of my
experiment I sent to a neighbouring
surgeon, requesting that he would come over to see me. In the evening he came; and after briefly stating the case to him, I asked this question; Whether he did not think that the opium
might have acted as a
stimulus to the digestive organs, and that the present
state of
suffering in the stomach, which manifestly was the
cause of the
inability to sleep,
might arise from
indigestion? His answer was; No; on the
contrary, he
thought that the
suffering was caused by
digestion itself, which should naturally go on below the
consciousness, but which from the unnatural
state of the stomach, vitiated by so long a use of opium, was become distinctly
perceptible. This
opinion was
plausible; and the unintermitting
nature of the
suffering disposes me to think that it was true, for if it had been any
mere irregular affection of the stomach, it should naturally have intermitted
occasionally, and constantly fluctuated as to
degree. The
intention of
nature, as manifested in the
healthy state,
obviously is to
withdraw from our
notice all the
vital motions, such as the
circulation of the blood, the
expansion and
contraction of the lungs, the peristaltic action of the stomach, &c., and opium, it seems, is
able in this, as in other instances, to counteract her purposes. By the
advice of the
surgeon I tried bitters. For a short time these greatly mitigated the feelings under which I laboured, but about the forty-second day of the
experiment the symptoms already noticed began to
retire, and new ones to
arise of a
different and far more tormenting class; under these, but with a few intervals of
remission, I have since continued to
suffer. But I
dismiss them undescribed for two reasons: first, because the
mind revolts from retracing circumstantially any sufferings from which it is removed by too short or by no
interval. To do this with minuteness enough to make the
review of any use would be indeed infandum renovare dolorem, and possibly without a
sufficient motive; for secondly, I
doubt whether this
latter state be anyway referable to opium-positively
considered, or even negatively; that is, whether it is to be numbered amongst the last evils from the direct action of opium, or even amongst the earliest evils
consequent upon a want of opium in a
system long
deranged by its use. Certainly one part of the symptoms
might be accounted for from the time of year (August), for though the summer was not a hot one, yet in any case the
sum of all the
heat funded (if one may say so) during the
previous months, added to the existing
heat of that month, naturally renders August in its better half the hottest part of the year; and it so happened that-the
excessive perspiration which even at Christmas attends any great
reduction in the daily
quantum of opium-and which in July was so
violent as to
oblige me to use a bath five or six times a day-had about the setting-in of the hottest season
wholly retired, on which
account any bad
effect of the
heat might be the more
unmitigated. Another
symptom-viz., what in my
ignorance I call
internal rheumatism (sometimes
affecting the shoulders, &c., but more often appearing to be seated in the stomach)-seemed again less
probably attributable to the opium, or the want of opium, than to the dampness of the house {21} which I
inhabit, which had about this time attained its
maximum, July having been, as usual, a month of
incessant rain in our most rainy part of England.
Under these reasons for doubting whether opium had any connexion with the
latter stage of my bodily wretchedness-except, indeed, as an
occasional cause, as having left the body weaker and more crazy, and
thus predisposed to any mal-influence whatever-I willingly
spare my reader all
description of it; let it
perish to him, and would that I could as easily say let it
perish to my own remembrances, that any
future hours of tranquillity may not be disturbed by too
vivid an
ideal of
possible human misery!
So much for the
sequel of my
experiment. As to the
former stage, in which
probably lies the
experiment and its
application to other cases, I must
request my reader not to
forget the reasons for which I have recorded it. These were two: First, a
belief that I
might add some
trifle to the history of opium as a
medical agent. In this I am
aware that I have not at all fulfilled my own intentions, in
consequence of the
torpor of
mind, pain of body, and
extreme disgust to the
subject which besieged me whilst writing that part of my paper; which part being
immediately sent off to the press (
distant about five degrees of
latitude), cannot be corrected or improved. But from this
account,
rambling as it may be, it is
evident that
thus much of
benefit may
arise to the persons most
interested in such a history of opium, viz., to opium-eaters in
general, that it establishes, for their
consolation and
encouragement, the
fact that opium may be renounced, and without greater sufferings than an
ordinary resolution may
support, and by a pretty
rapid course {22} of
descent.
To
communicate this
result of my
experiment was my
foremost purpose. Secondly, as a
purpose collateral to this, I wished to
explain how it had become
impossible for me to
compose a Third Part in time to
accompany this republication; for during the time of this
experiment the proof-sheets of this reprint were sent to me from London, and such was my
inability to
expand or to
improve them, that I could not even bear to read them over with
attention enough to
notice the press errors or to correct any
verbal inaccuracies. These were my reasons for
troubling my reader with any
record, long or short, of experiments relating to so truly
base a
subject as my own body; and I am
earnest with the reader that he will not
forget them, or so far
misapprehend me as to believe it
possible that I would
condescend to so rascally a
subject for its own sake, or indeed for any less
object than that of
general benefit to others. Such an animal as the self-observing valetudinarian I know there is; I have met him myself
occasionally, and I know that he is the worst
imaginable heautontimoroumenos; aggravating and sustaining, by calling into
distinct consciousness, every
symptom that would else perhaps, under a
different direction given to the thoughts, become
evanescent. But as to myself, so
profound is my
contempt for this undignified and
selfish habit, that I could as little
condescend to it as I could to spend my time in watching a poor
servant girl, to whom at this
moment I hear some lad or other making love at the back of my house. Is it for a Transcendental Philosopher to feel any
curiosity on such an
occasion? Or can I, whose life is worth only eight and a half years'
purchase, be
supposed to have
leisure for such
trivial employments? However, to put this out of question, I shall say one thing, which will perhaps shock some readers, but I am sure it ought not to do so, considering the motives on which I say it. No man, I
suppose, employs much of his time on the phenomena of his own body without some regard for it; whereas the reader sees that, so far from looking upon
mine with any
complacency or regard, I hate it, and make it the
object of my
bitter ridicule and
contempt; and I should not be displeased to know that the last indignities which the law inflicts upon the bodies of the worst malefactors
might hereafter fall upon it. And, in testification of my
sincerity in saying this, I shall make the following offer. Like other men, I have
particular fancies about the place of my
burial; having lived
chiefly in a mountainous
region, I rather
cleave to the
conceit, that a
grave in a green churchyard amongst the
ancient and
solitary hills will be a sublimer and more
tranquil place of
repose for a
philosopher than any in the
hideous Golgothas of London. Yet if the gentlemen of Surgeons' Hall think that any
benefit can
redound to their science from inspecting the appearances in the body of an opium-eater, let them speak but a word, and I will take care that
mine shall be
legally secured to them-i.e., as soon as I have done with it myself. Let them not
hesitate to
express their wishes upon any scruples of false
delicacy and
consideration for my feelings; I
assure them they will do me too much honour by "demonstrating" on such a crazy body as
mine, and it will give me pleasure to
anticipate this
posthumous revenge and
insult inflicted upon that which has caused me so much
suffering in this life. Such bequests are not
common; reversionary benefits
contingent upon the death of the
testator are indeed
dangerous to
announce in many cases: of this we have a
instance in the habits of a Roman prince, who used, upon any notification made to him by rich persons that they had left him a
handsome estate in their wills, to
express his
entire satisfaction at such arrangements and his
gracious acceptance of those
loyal legacies; but then, if the testators
neglected to give him
immediate possession of the
property, if they traitorously "persisted in living" (si vivere perseverarent, as Suetonius expresses it), he was highly provoked, and took his measures
accordingly. In those times, and from one of the worst of the Cæsars, we
might expect such
conduct; but I am sure that from English surgeons at this day I
need look for no expressions of
impatience, or of any other feelings but such as are answerable to that pure love of science and all its interests which induces me to make such an offer.